We all have that one friend who thinks the NBA needs to stop at 30 teams because 82 games is already too much to handle on a Tuesday night when you have work the next day.
But if you ask Adam Silver or any of the billionaire owners sitting in the luxury boxes at the Barclays Center, they are probably thinking exactly the opposite.
The idea of NBA expansion has been bouncing around like a penny in a vending machine for years now, but recently, the clinking sound of coins hitting the metal tray has gotten louder.
We are talking about potentially adding two, maybe even four, new franchises to the league.
It sounds like a dream come true for die-hard fans who still mourn the departure of the Seattle Supersonics, but the reality of expanding a sports league is way messier than it looks on paper.
Why Now? The Money Talks, But History Whispers
And honestly, what is the point of having a trillion-dollar media rights deal if you aren’t going to use it to build an empire? The league has been cashing in on the global boom of basketball, especially in places like China and India, but they can’t just market a 30-team product to those markets efficiently.
They need homegrown teams to build rivalries.
It is a simple business case.
More teams mean more jersey sales, more merchandise, and more chances for the league to negotiate better TV deals.
However, you have to wonder if the league is getting greedy.
We just went through a pandemic that almost killed the season, and now they want to stretch the talent pool even thinner? It feels a little ambitious, but let’s be real, the owners aren’t exactly hurting for cash.
The Geography Problem
So, where are these new teams actually going to play? This is the million-dollar question—or should I say, the billion-dollar question.
The obvious frontrunner is Seattle.
It has been the whipping boy of the NBA for over a decade now.
Everyone wants the Sonics back.
The fan base is there, the arena situation is being worked out, and the emotional weight of bringing a franchise back to a city that loved it so much it literally riot-ed when they left is just too heavy for the NBA to ignore for much longer.
But wait, let’s not forget about Vancouver.
The Grizzlies left Canada once, but the second time might be the charm if the city is willing to build a shiny new arena.
Now think about that for a second.
- Seattle, WA: The most likely candidate, pending arena approval.
- Vancouver, BC: A strong second option with existing fan infrastructure.
- Las Vegas, NV: The entertainment capital, but still lacks a major pro sports team.
- Montreal, QC: A dark horse candidate that would bring the league back to Canada’s second largest city.
Oddly enough,
Then there is the wild card.
Montreal.
It feels like a long shot because the NBA left Canada in the 90s, but the league has been dipping its toes back into the Canadian waters with the Raptors being the kings of the East for a decade.
A team in Montreal would split the Canadian market and generate a massive amount of goodwill north of the border.
But you also have to look at places like Vegas.
The NBA has dabbled there with the Summer League for years.
The market is hungry, the entertainment aspect fits perfectly, but there is something weirdly empty about watching basketball in a stadium full of people who just came to see a Cirque du Soleil show.
The Sabermetrics Nightmare
But hold on a second, before you start designing your new t-shirt collection with the new team logo on it, let’s talk about the math.
And I hate math, mostly because I am bad at it, but here we go.
The salary cap is the biggest hurdle.
The league operates on a hard cap system, meaning teams have a strict limit on how much they can pay their players.
If you add four new teams, you are adding four more rosters of 15 players each. Oddly enough,
That is sixty new players.
Where are they coming from? They are coming from the existing teams, which means the talent pool is getting diluted.
It is a classic supply and demand issue.
If you flood the market with more players, the average talent level drops.
This scares veteran players and stars.
If you dilute the league, stars might make less money because the revenue share gets spread thinner across more teams.
It feels counterintuitive, right? Usually, you want more players to get better, but in a league with a fixed salary cap, you don’t really want more players; you want fewer players and more money per player.
It’s a delicate balance that the league officials are obviously crunching the numbers on right now, trying to figure out how to keep the superstars happy while giving the new guys a chance to breathe.
Oddly enough,
The Draft Lottery Dilemma
Then there is the draft lottery system, which is already a mess of pocket checking and conspiracy theories.
Imagine trying to run a lottery for a 32-team league.
Currently, the worst record gets the best chance.
But if you have more teams, the odds of getting the number one pick get even worse for the worst teams.
It makes the idea of tanking even more tempting. And this is where things get interesting.
It makes the regular season even more meaningless for 25 teams.
And let’s be honest, the regular season is already a slog of back-to-back games on national TV that nobody really watches until the playoffs start in April.
Why add more games nobody cares about just to populate the schedule?
The Rivalry Factor
Now think about that for a second.
Look, I get it.
We want new rivalries.
We want to see the new guys trash talk the legends.
But creating rivalries takes time.
It takes history.
You can’t just draft a player and expect them to hate the opposing team’s star on day one.
It takes years of bickering and physical play to build that kind of animosity that makes a basketball game actually worth watching when the score is 98-95 in the fourth quarter.
And here is the thing about expansion teams: they are usually terrible for the first five years.
They are like the college freshman trying to integrate into a frat house; they get knocked around a lot before they find their footing.
So, we have to look at the fans.
The loyal fans who buy season tickets every year. Now think about that for a second.
They have to suffer through a decade of high draft picks and heartbreak.
Is it fair to them? The league owners are making a ton of money off the current franchises.
Why risk the anger of the existing fan bases just to squeeze a few more bucks out of a global audience? It’s a gamble, and usually, the owners are the ones who hate gambling.
Conclusion
Ultimately, I think an expansion is inevitable.
The money is just too good to pass up.
The league has a global footprint that is bigger than it has ever been, and they need local representation in those markets. And this is where things get interesting.
But I also feel like we are rushing into it.
We need to make sure we aren’t just throwing darts at a map to see where they land.
It has to make sense.
We need the right ownership groups, the right markets, and most importantly, we need to respect the history of the game.
It’s a lot of pressure to get this right.
If the NBA expands now, they could set themselves up for another golden age of basketball. Oddly enough,
But if they mess it up, if they water down the product too much, we might just end up with a league that is fun to watch, but doesn’t feel quite as special as it did when we were younger.
And let’s face it, nothing hurts more than seeing a league you love slowly turn into something generic.
I’m keeping my fingers crossed for Seattle, but I’m also crossing my toes that the league office knows what they are doing.
What do you think? Will it be Seattle or Vegas?
Drop a comment below and let me know your thoughts.
Are you ready for 32 teams, or should the league stay at 30?
Image source credit: pexels.com